Okay so I saw this deal and had to share...

Just kidding. Broadcom dropped two Wi-Fi 8 chips and they're still doing that whole dual-band vs tri-band thing.

Okay so I saw this deal and had to share...

Scout Team

|January 6, 20262 min read

So here's what's happening. Broadcom just announced their first Wi-Fi 8 chips, and guess what? They're keeping the same split we saw with Wi-Fi 7. You've got your basic dual-band chips for us regular folks, and then the fancy tri-band ones for people who actually need to stream 8K video to seventeen devices at once.

I've been testing Wi-Fi 7 gear for the past year, and honestly? Most people don't need the tri-band stuff. But Broadcom's betting that won't change with Wi-Fi 8. Their new dual-band chips will handle the 2.4GHz and 5GHz bands, which is what 95% of us actually use. Sure, the tri-band versions add 6GHz, but unless you live in a tech mansion with walls made of router interference, you're probably fine without it.

What bugs me is the pricing gap this creates. Remember when Wi-Fi 6E came out? The tri-band routers cost literally double. Same thing happened with Wi-Fi 7. Now we're looking at the same pattern with Wi-Fi 8 in 2027. The dual-band routers will probably hit $150-200, while tri-band versions push $400+.

Here's the kicker though. These new chips are supposed to be way more power efficient. My current Wi-Fi 7 router runs hot enough to fry an egg. If Broadcom actually fixed that with Wi-Fi 8, I might upgrade just for the lower electricity bill. Plus they're claiming better performance in crowded areas, which anyone in an apartment building knows is the real problem.

Bottom line? Unless you're running a home server farm or have gigabit fiber and actually use it, the dual-band Wi-Fi 8 gear will be plenty when it drops next year. Save your money for something fun instead.

Related Articles